Topic: Does 69_position + penises imply mutual_penile_penetration? I hope not!

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Hopefully this is the right way to go about a query like this. It's kinda tough to read the forum guidelines today lol.

I noticed that the tag mutual_penile_penetration is included in multiple posts with 69_position where two penis-having characters are fellating/fellatio-ing(?) each other. Less than half the mutual_penile_penetration posts are about 69 specifically.

Normally I'd imagine this would be used for two penis-equipped individuals penetrating each other in any other fashion BESIDES orally, i.e. mutual_sheath_penetration, mutual_slit_penetration, mutual_slit_knotting, mutual_cloacal, etc. Though maybe I'm wrong on this one.
But IF mutual_penile_penetration should be an implied tag for 69_position any time it is a schlong-on-schlong situation, then that is a LOT of posts that need updating. This would be a challenge to facilitate as well, because thought the tags may all align like penis and 69_position, a post could feature 69 with to vaginas while some dudes are putting their tapered dicks in each other's slits and it would end up getting tagged totally incorrectly!

My suggestion is to set in stone that mutual_penile_penetration is NOT a tag that should be used implicitly for shared dick-in-mouth scenarios. Something in the wiki could mention it perhaps? I think I've seen this kind of clarification elsewhere. No other changes would be needed, though I may take up going through the posts currently tagged "improperly" after this is decided upon. Thoughts?

(and HOPEFULLY this is legible in the next 24 hours, or at least still discussed after the UWU speak joke has ended lol!)

ladderdealer said:
Hopefully this is the right way to go about a query like this. It's kinda tough to read the forum guidelines today lol.

I noticed that the tag mutual_penile_penetration is included in multiple posts with 69_position where two penis-having characters are fellating/fellatio-ing(?) each other. Less than half the mutual_penile_penetration posts are about 69 specifically.

Normally I'd imagine this would be used for two penis-equipped individuals penetrating each other in any other fashion BESIDES orally, i.e. mutual_sheath_penetration, mutual_slit_penetration, mutual_slit_knotting, mutual_cloacal, etc. Though maybe I'm wrong on this one.
But IF mutual_penile_penetration should be an implied tag for 69_position any time it is a schlong-on-schlong situation, then that is a LOT of posts that need updating. This would be a challenge to facilitate as well, because thought the tags may all align like penis and 69_position, a post could feature 69 with to vaginas while some dudes are putting their tapered dicks in each other's slits and it would end up getting tagged totally incorrectly!

My suggestion is to set in stone that mutual_penile_penetration is NOT a tag that should be used implicitly for shared dick-in-mouth scenarios. Something in the wiki could mention it perhaps? I think I've seen this kind of clarification elsewhere. No other changes would be needed, though I may take up going through the posts currently tagged "improperly" after this is decided upon. Thoughts?

(and HOPEFULLY this is legible in the next 24 hours, or at least still discussed after the UWU speak joke has ended lol!)

π–Έπ—ˆπ—Ž 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π–»π—’π—‰π–Ίπ—Œπ—Œ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—Žπ—π—Ž π—Œπ—‰π–Ύπ–Ίπ—„ 𝖻𝗒 𝗍𝗒𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍 π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‡π— (π—Œπ—Žπ–Όπ— π–Ίπ—Œ π—π—π—ˆπ—Žπ—€π— 𝖺𝗇 π—ˆπ—‡π—…π—‚π—‡π–Ύ π—€π–Ύπ—‡π–Ύπ—‹π–Ίπ—π—ˆπ—‹) π—ˆπ—‹ 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝗒 π—Šπ—Žπ—ˆπ—π—‚π—‡π—€ π—Œπ—ˆπ—†π–Ύπ—ˆπ—‡π–Ύ'π—Œ π–Όπ—ˆπ—†π—†π–Ύπ—‡π— 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗍.

π– π—Œ π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‹ π—’π—ˆπ—Žπ—‹ π—ˆπ—‹π—‚π—€π—‚π—‡π–Ίπ—… π—Šπ—Žπ–Ύπ—Œπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡, 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝗅𝖾 π—†π—Žπ—π—Žπ–Ίπ—…_𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖾_π—‰π–Ύπ—‡π–Ύπ—π—‹π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡ 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π–Όπ—ˆπ—‡π—Œπ—‚π—Œπ— π—†π—ˆπ—Œπ—π—…π—’ π—ˆπ–Ώ 69_π—‰π—ˆπ—Œπ—‚π—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡ π—‰π—ˆπ—Œπ—π—Œ π–½π—ˆπ—‚π—‡π—€ π—ˆπ—‹π–Ίπ—… π—ˆπ—‡ 𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 π—ˆπ—π—π–Ύπ—‹, 𝗂𝗍 π—Œπ—π—ˆπ—Žπ—…π–½ π—ˆπ—‡π—…π—’ 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝗅𝗒 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—‰π–Ύπ—‡π—‚π—Œ π—‚π—Œ π–Ώπ—Žπ—…π—…π—’ π—‚π—‡π—Œπ—‚π–½π–Ύ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—ˆπ—π—π–Ύπ—‹'π—Œ π—†π—ˆπ—Žπ—π—. π–₯π–Ύπ—…π—…π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆ 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π—‚π—‡π–Όπ—…π—Žπ–½π–Ύ 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 π—‡π—ˆπ—‡-𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 π–Ώπ—Žπ—…π—…-π—ˆπ—‡ 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 π–»π—…π—ˆπ—π—ƒπ—ˆπ–».

thegreatwolfgang said:
π–Έπ—ˆπ—Ž 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π–»π—’π—‰π–Ίπ—Œπ—Œ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—Žπ—π—Ž π—Œπ—‰π–Ύπ–Ίπ—„ 𝖻𝗒 𝗍𝗒𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍 π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‡π— (π—Œπ—Žπ–Όπ— π–Ίπ—Œ π—π—π—ˆπ—Žπ—€π— 𝖺𝗇 π—ˆπ—‡π—…π—‚π—‡π–Ύ π—€π–Ύπ—‡π–Ύπ—‹π–Ίπ—π—ˆπ—‹) π—ˆπ—‹ 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝗒 π—Šπ—Žπ—ˆπ—π—‚π—‡π—€ π—Œπ—ˆπ—†π–Ύπ—ˆπ—‡π–Ύ'π—Œ π–Όπ—ˆπ—†π—†π–Ύπ—‡π— 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗍.

π– π—Œ π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‹ π—’π—ˆπ—Žπ—‹ π—ˆπ—‹π—‚π—€π—‚π—‡π–Ίπ—… π—Šπ—Žπ–Ύπ—Œπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡, 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝗅𝖾 π—†π—Žπ—π—Žπ–Ίπ—…_𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖾_π—‰π–Ύπ—‡π–Ύπ—π—‹π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡ 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π–Όπ—ˆπ—‡π—Œπ—‚π—Œπ— π—†π—ˆπ—Œπ—π—…π—’ π—ˆπ–Ώ 69_π—‰π—ˆπ—Œπ—‚π—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡ π—‰π—ˆπ—Œπ—π—Œ π–½π—ˆπ—‚π—‡π—€ π—ˆπ—‹π–Ίπ—… π—ˆπ—‡ 𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 π—ˆπ—π—π–Ύπ—‹, 𝗂𝗍 π—Œπ—π—ˆπ—Žπ—…π–½ π—ˆπ—‡π—…π—’ 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝗅𝗒 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—‰π–Ύπ—‡π—‚π—Œ π—‚π—Œ π–Ώπ—Žπ—…π—…π—’ π—‚π—‡π—Œπ—‚π–½π–Ύ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—ˆπ—π—π–Ύπ—‹'π—Œ π—†π—ˆπ—Žπ—π—. π–₯π–Ύπ—…π—…π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆ 𝖼𝖺𝗇 π—‚π—‡π–Όπ—…π—Žπ–½π–Ύ 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 π—‡π—ˆπ—‡-𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 π–Ώπ—Žπ—…π—…-π—ˆπ—‡ 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 π–»π—…π—ˆπ—π—ƒπ—ˆπ–».

Thanks. That clears things up a bit.

  • 1