Topic: Dakimakura BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #7355 is active.

remove implication dakimakura_pillow (495) -> dakimakura_design (5065)

Reason: As the name suggests, dakimakura_design should mean "design" not an object in an image.

design
post #621352

dakimakura as an object
post #4645032

EDIT: The bulk update request #7355 (forum #398539) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

crocogator said:
A dakimakura pillow is just a body_pillow with a character printed on it (or rather, printed on the pillow case).

抱き枕 (dakimakura) is literally just Japanese for "body pillow", but in the English-speaking world, we use it for this more specific usage.

So isn't the current implication correct? Every dakimakura pillow will necessarily have a design on it, which is then necessarily a dakimakura design. If it doesn't have a design, it's not a dakimakura pillow.

strikerman said:
So isn't the current implication correct? Every dakimakura pillow will necessarily have a design on it, which is then necessarily a dakimakura design. If it doesn't have a design, it's not a dakimakura pillow.

As I cuwwently see it, the design tag shouwd be fow images whewe the whowe image is a dakimuwa_design, nyot fow images which contain a design somewhewe in the image. So post #4269372 gets excwuded and post #621352 is incwuded

It wouwd awso be nyice to be abwe to seawch fow dakimuwa_designs whewe the chawactew is howding a dakimuwa_piwwow

snpthecat said:
As I cuwwently see it, the design tag shouwd be fow images whewe the whowe image is a dakimuwa_design, nyot fow images which contain a design somewhewe in the image. So post #4269372 gets excwuded and post #621352 is incwuded

It wouwd awso be nyice to be abwe to seawch fow dakimuwa_designs whewe the chawactew is howding a dakimuwa_piwwow

Fair enough, I can understand that.

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #7376 is active.

remove alias dakimakura (5079) -> dakimakura_design (5065)

Reason: Given above.

Should we disambiguate or move to the invalid category afterwards? Leaning towards moving it to invalid category, it's an incomplete tag

What if dakimakura_design and dakimakura_pillow both implied dakimakura as an umbrella tag? That way people searching for just dakimakura would still get results

wandering_spaniel said:
What if dakimakura_design and dakimakura_pillow both implied dakimakura as an umbrella tag? That way people searching for just dakimakura would still get results

That could work.

The bulk update request #7431 is active.

create implication dakimakura_design (5065) -> dakimakura (5079)
create implication dakimakura_pillow (495) -> dakimakura (5079)
remove alias daki (0) -> dakimakura_design (5065)

Reason: My above suggestion of using dakimakura as an umbrella tag for these two, so searching it returns all daki related images

After:
alias daki -> dakimakura

EDIT: The bulk update request #7431 (forum #399735) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1