The tag implication #61109 not_furry_focus -> not_furry has been rejected.

Reason: Same thing as other "x_focus" tags

EDIT: The tag implication not_furry_focus -> not_furry (forum #399292) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

mothbean said:
The tag implication #61109 not_furry_focus -> not_furry has been rejected.

Reason: Same thing as other "x_focus" tags

From the wiki:

This tag is used when a post is focused on not_furry character(s) and also contains furry character(s).

If a post only contains not_furry character(s), use the not_furry tag instead of this one.

Actually, these two tags are mutually incompatible. Not furry requires there to be no furry characters in the picture. Not furry focus indicates there are furry characters in the picture, but the focus of the picture is not on them but on one or more non-furry characters.

post #1962826

• Doomguy is a human in a suit. He is a focal character that takes up much of the canvas.
• Daisy (the princess) is a human wearing fake rabbit ears. She is also a focal character taking up a good part of the canvas.
• Daisy (the rabbit) is a rabbit. She is a furry character, but not a focus.

post #3883357

• Debidebi Debiru is a furry character, and furry ears are visible on them (along with horns, a spade tail, and wings.) They are not a focus in this version (but they are the focus in the linked post.)
• Akaharadou Akira is a human and the focal character.

mothbean said:
Reason: Same thing as other "x_focus" tags

tags requires some non-x thing visible. solo_focus requires non-solo (2+) characters visible, male_focus requires non-male characters visible, etc. x_focus can only imply x when x can include non-x things (e.g. female_focus can imply female because non-females can appear with the female tag, but solo_focus can't imply solo since non-solo characters can't be tagged with solo).

The tag implication not_furry_focus -> not_furry (forum #399292) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.