The tag alias #69231 hyper_penetration -> extreme_penetration is pending approval.

Reason: extreme penetration is the equivalent of hyper_[most other things], coming after large penetration and huge penetration.

(I wouldn't be opposed to reversing it actually)

bumping this bc I just tried to make the exact same alias lol

Might be best to disambiguate it instead. It's not neccesarily equivalent (see its wiki).

scth said:
Might be best to disambiguate it instead. It's not neccesarily equivalent (see its wiki).

I don't see how its any less ambiguous than extreme penetration tbh.

Extreme penetration might even be more ambiguous, seeing as how the 'large/huge/extreme' we're using for penetration bucks the trend of the general 'big/huge/hyper' we have for most everything else.

might be closer to ridiculous_fit

I feel like hyper_penetration should be penetration from/of a hyper bodypart.
Like this
post #5021272

As opposed to this
post #3845772

regsmutt said:
As opposed to this
post #3845772

Is that not just it'll never fit

donovan_dmc said:
Is that not just it'll never fit

Or ridiculous_fit. People seem to conflate all these tags.

donovan_dmc said:
Is that not just it'll never fit

Since it's already inside, according to the wiki, no.

I don't think that's necessary, 'cause you don't need hyper genitals to have extreme penetration. It wouldn't make sense. Hyper implies something is abnormally big, but technically speaking based on the site's tagging rules, if a genitalia or object is a natural size, it must be tagged as such (like micro and macro rules).

Therefore if two characters are drawn, but one is naturally much smaller or bigger than other, it doesn't automatically mean there's "hyper" content. One character's genitals can just be big compared to the size of their partner, which would make the penetration "extreme" but not "hyper".