Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #7426 is pending approval.
create implication broken_bone (284) -> bone (37360)
create implication exposed_bone (673) -> bone (37360)
Reason: You wouldn't be able to tell that a bone is broken without it being visible and if a bone is exposed it also falls under TWYS
mothbean said:
Reason: You wouldn't be able to tell that a bone is broken without it being visible and if a bone is exposed it also falls under TWYS
You could also tell a bone is broken by a significant bend where there isn't a joint, without having to see the bone itself.
watsit said:
post #3676161You could also tell a bone is broken by a significant bend where there isn't a joint, without having to see the bone itself.
True. I was actually thinking of suggesting a compound fracture tag to differentiate between situations where the bone has broken the skin and where it hasn't but I wasn't sure how needed it would be.
