The bulk update request #7514 has been rejected.

create implication bessie_busybody (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication big_bad_wolf_(lazytown) (1) -> lazytown (34)
create implication bobbie_rotten (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication flobbie_rotten (1) -> lazytown (34)
create implication milford_meanswell (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication pixel_(lazytown) (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication robbie_rotten (18) -> lazytown (34)
create implication sportacus (10) -> lazytown (34)
create implication stephanie_(lazytown) (11) -> lazytown (34)
create implication stingy_(lazytown) (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication tobbie_rotten (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication trixie_(lazytown) (0) -> lazytown (34)
create implication ziggy_(lazytown) (0) -> lazytown (34)

Reason: Characters from LazyTown. Also future-proofing some tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7514 (forum #400277) has been rejected by @Cinder.

I agree with creating implications for robbie_rotten, stephanie and sportacus.
The rest have 1 or no posts at all, I don't know if these are necessary.

coffeeco said:
I agree with creating implications for robbie_rotten, stephanie and sportacus.
The rest have 1 or no posts at all, I don't know if these are necessary.

I'm just future-proofing them.

The bulk update request #7636 is active.

create implication big_bad_wolf_(lazytown) (1) -> lazytown (34)
create implication flobbie_rotten (1) -> lazytown (34)
create implication robbie_rotten (18) -> lazytown (34)
create implication sportacus (10) -> lazytown (34)
create implication stephanie_(lazytown) (11) -> lazytown (34)

Reason: There is no need to create empty tags and pointless implications for them.
Implications can be made when / if those tags get populated.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7636 (forum #401290) has been approved by @Cinder.

The bulk update request #7514 (forum #400277) has been rejected by @Cinder.

The bulk update request #7636 (forum #401290) has been approved by @Cinder.