The tag implication #61293 messy_diaper -> feces has been rejected.

Reason: This tag always implies scat within its art.

EDIT: The tag implication messy_diaper -> scat (forum #400354) has been rejected by @slyroon.

idontknowtobehonest said:
The tag implication #61293 messy_diaper -> feces has been rejected.

Reason: This tag always implies scat within its art.

feces is not scat

scat:
Images or animations depicting characters taking part in activities involving coprophilia, a fetish involving deriving sexual pleasure from feces or the act of defecation.

messy diaper already implies feces

but like heres the thing, like, feces and scat are basically the same thign due to it being mistagged so hard. I think there was some debate about aliasing the two together and using a new scat-play tag

snpthecat said:
feces is not scat
messy diaper already implies feces

I understand, but the tag is almost always in a sexual context. I haven't seen a post under "messy_diaper" that wasn't sexualized. Thus, messy_diaper fits under the description of scat/coprophilia.

Also what is messy diaper's purpose? It seems to be an unnecessary step that doesn't provide anything, especially since it shouldn't be tagged directly and has only soiled diaper implying it

maybe topic #33263 would be helpful as well

idontknowtobehonest said:
I understand, but the tag is almost always in a sexual context. I haven't seen a post under "messy_diaper" that wasn't sexualized. Thus, messy_diaper fits under the description of scat/coprophilia.

I think I chose the wrong tag
maybe soiled_diaper might've worked better?

idontknowtobehonest said:
I think I chose the wrong tag
maybe soiled_diaper might've worked better?

No it would not. The same problems arise there as it would here.

idontknowtobehonest said:
I understand, but the tag is almost always in a sexual context. I haven't seen a post under "messy_diaper" that wasn't sexualized. Thus, messy_diaper fits under the description of scat/coprophilia.

"almost" isn't always, if A is not always B, then I don't think it should imply B.

Probably because it's so commonly blacklisted, looking at the feces link there's a number of redundant/unnecessary tags. Do we need the bristol type tags? Do we need both hard_stool AND hard_feces? How are those even tagged visually? And what about touching/squishing_feces_bulge?

Congratulations. Due to topic #31198 being approved this is now valid (if the initial plan is to follow through) (Though it would be redundant because it's already implied through soiling)

The tag implication messy_diaper -> scat (forum #400354) has been rejected by @slyroon.