The bulk update request #7741 is pending approval.

create implication chobits (7) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create implication magic_knight_rayearth (13) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create implication cardcaptor_sakura (164) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create implication angelic_layer (1) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create alias tsubasa_chronicles (2) -> tsubasa:_reservoir_chronicle (0)
create implication tsubasa:_reservoir_chronicle (0) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create implication xxxholic (1) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)
create implication kobato (41) -> clamp_(artist_group) (0)

Reason: All of these manga series were created by the group Clamp, which frequently does crossovers between their series, so I think it makes sense to group them under an umbrella tag.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clamp_(manga_artists)

Various series by the group cross-reference each other, and characters reappear in multiple works by the group, with Tsubasa, a series set across multiple dimensions, featuring multiple alternative versions of characters from past works.

There's already one_(manga), so it's not unprecedented. I'm not really a fan of *_(manga) in this case, though, so if anyone has any other suggestions...

Could I ask for clarification on the mehs?

I'm not a fan of the one_(manga) tag either, we don't usually create implications for individual creators.

I think I'd prefer the _(artist_group) suffix instead of _(manga). The latter makes it feel like an actual manga/comic, rather than an artist group or collective (who presumably don't have to only create manga).

strikerman said:
we don't usually create implications for individual creators.

Don Bluth

pleaseletmein said:
Don Bluth

Dr. Seuss

watsit said:
I think I'd prefer the _(artist_group) suffix instead of _(manga). The latter makes it feel like an actual manga/comic, rather than an artist group or collective (who presumably don't have to only create manga).

Artist group works too, I don't like (manga) at the end either. I'll change it to that, unless anyone has any other suggestions.

strikerman said:
I'm not a fan of the one_(manga) tag either, we don't usually create implications for individual creators.

We have quite a few of these actually, the aforementioned ones, stephen_king_(copyright), osamu_tezuka, etc.

CLAMP I think is more warranted because it's a group of creators and the works actually overlap.