The bulk update request #7828 is pending approval.
mass update plush_stuffing -> stuffing_(plush)
Reason: plush_stuffing follows the noun_action format, which could lead to it not being used in favor of the incorrect stuffing.
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #7828 is pending approval.
mass update plush_stuffing -> stuffing_(plush)
Reason: plush_stuffing follows the noun_action format, which could lead to it not being used in favor of the incorrect stuffing.
That's a can of worms, isn't it? Doesn't stuffing_(plush) imply the existence of e.g stuffing_(pillow)? It would be simpler for there to just be a tag for stuffing(foam, cotton, down, polyfill etc) itself. That would make a search or blacklist of plush stuffing_tag or stuffing_tag -plush equally effective. In other cases we've been told to avoid using _(disamgibuators) in situations like this, where a combination of discreet tags can define the same set of images.
That would have the added benefit of leaving plush_stuffing open for the actual act of stuffing a plush, which must have at least a few pictures.
Amusingly, the tag stuffing has been consumed by an act of gluttony, so I'm not sure what this hypothetical stuffing tag should be called. Would be valid to reclaim stuffing by updating it to overeating or something?