Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #7833 is pending approval.
create implication baby_spice (1) -> spice_girls (8)
create implication ginger_spice (1) -> spice_girls (8)
create implication posh_spice (1) -> spice_girls (8)
create implication scary_spice (1) -> spice_girls (8)
create implication sporty_spice (1) -> spice_girls (8)
Reason: All five members from Spice Girls.
Aren't groups usually tagged only when the whole group is present?
watsit said:
Aren't groups usually tagged only when the whole group is present?
Spice Girls is less like a character group tag and more like a copyright tag.
theghost123 said:
Spice Girls is less like a character group tag and more like a copyright tag.
Should it apply to characters that only have a minor resemblance to the individual band members, in that case? Having pigtails, for example, isn't unique to the Spice Girls brand.
watsit said:
Should it apply to characters that only have a minor resemblance to the individual band members, in that case? Having pigtails, for example, isn't unique to the Spice Girls brand.
The sources of the posts in the pool do say they are based on the Spice Girls.
Updated
watsit said:
Aren't groups usually tagged only when the whole group is present?
Usually no
wonderbolts (mlp)
team rocket
the deadly six
dimitrescu sisters
Updated
