Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #70055 chubby_girly -> slightly_chubby_femboy is pending approval.
Reason: Both the chubby_male/chubby_anthro/chubby_humanoid tags got updated to have the "slightly_" added towards the beginning, and it looks like girly got changed to femboy
So the chubby_girly tag is in need of an update too
Are we really turning femboy into the 9th gender tag?
I believe we're trying to avoid turning femboy into a gender tag. femboy slightly_chubby_male works fine.
I would reserve these type of tags for things that can't easily be searched for.
nimphia said:
I believe we're trying to avoid turning femboy into a gender tag. femboy slightly_chubby_male works fine.I would reserve these type of tags for things that can't easily be searched for.
I'm not defending my tag again, I've already had to when I initially made it, all I need is an update.
All I'm gonna repeat is femboy slightly_chubby_male does not narrow it down to a character that has both attributes, you'll often get a mix of those features split between two or more characters, and considering how many posts I was able to add that tag to already, I'd say it's a perfectly justified tag
Updated
faucet said:
Are we really turning femboy into the 9th gender tag?
It really seems like we are, especially since femboy/femboy wasn't aliased back (the girly/girly alias was also removed and never redirected anywhere), and there's some requests to validate femboy penetrating/penetrated and more
donovan_dmc said:
It really seems like we are, especially since femboy/femboy wasn't aliased back (the girly/girly alias was also removed and never redirected anywhere), and there's some requests to validate femboy penetrating/penetrated and more
Actually, the proposal was just to validate femboy_on_femboy, femboy_penetrating and dominant_femboy because currently they are extremely difficult to search for (any search combination will give you primarily the opposite results of what you're looking for).
Scaliespe proposed in the other thread that we alias away unnecessary tags like femboy_penetrated or femboy_on_female where femboy male_penetrated and femboy male/female would return the same results. In the original post's case, as I pointed out, this tag would be functionally identical to femboy slightly_chubby_male and thus isn't really necessary.
smuglytherat said:
All I'm gonna repeat is femboy slightly_chubby_male does not narrow it down to a character that has both attributes, you'll often get a mix of those features split between two or more characters, and considering how many posts I was able to add that tag to already, I'd say it's a perfectly justified tag
It's mixed, yes, but it's primarily correct for what you're looking for, unlike something like femboy male_penetrating. In fact, I'd say it's predominantly slightly chubby femboys, not femboys with other slightly chubby males.
