Topic: adopted tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

romanicyte2

Member

The bulk update request #7957 is pending approval.

create implication adoptive_father_(lore) (652) -> adoptive_parent_(lore) (0)
create implication adoptive_mother_(lore) (417) -> adoptive_parent_(lore) (0)
create implication adopted_son_(lore) (843) -> adopted_child_(lore) (0)
create implication adopted_daughter_(lore) (281) -> adopted_child_(lore) (0)
create alias adopted_brother (21) -> adoptive_brother_(lore) (189)
create alias adopted_sister (0) -> adoptive_sister_(lore) (125)

Reason: Not sure if tags such as adoptive_father_and_child_(lore) should exist, feels like overkill the amount of family tags at this point.

Nimphia

Privileged

I have a BUR for this already: topic #43146

I believe we're not supposed to use the normal family tags for adopted family, so they're not overkill IMO. If anything the singular tags are redundant, not the pairing tags, since they're not meant to be used on their own.

Edit: Meh because my BUR doesn't include adoptive_child_(lore) but again, singular role tags are kinda redundant.

Updated

  • 1