The bulk update request #7967 is active.

remove implication pickle_rick (46) -> rick_sanchez (138)

Reason: Just... Why? Implying it to rick_and_morty I think makes sense but this is just dumb. First of all, it's a meme tag, not a character, but even if it was a character tag, we don't imply alternate forms anyways.

The meme can be referenced without Rick being present whatsoever:

post #4249664 post #4299572 post #2265449

EDIT: The bulk update request #7967 (forum #403923) has been approved by @Cinder.

The bulk update request #7967 (forum #403923) has been approved by @Cinder.

It was a character tag when the implication was originally created, but it ended up a meme copyright tag instead with the character moved to pickle_rick_(character). I could've sworn this implication got deleted long ago, but I guess it never actually made it that far. There's probably a long-forgotten BUR somewhere that I can't be bothered to find.

A rick_and_morty implication probably wouldn't fit here either, since a reference is just saying words, nothing from Rick and Morty needs actually be present.

nimphia said:
... we don't imply alternate forms anyways.

Even after all these years, it seems like the jury's still out on that one.

faucet said:
A rick_and_morty implication probably wouldn't fit here either, since a reference is just saying words, nothing from Rick and Morty needs actually be present.

The words are a rick and morty quote, though

Edit: well... not always an exact quote, I guess. Maybe you're right

wandering_spaniel said:
The words are a rick and morty quote, though

Edit: well... not always an exact quote, I guess. Maybe you're right

there's also the "funniest shit I've ever seen" copypasta being tagged with this as well.