Topic: [APPROVED] Unimplying clothes to clothing

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #8158 is active.

remove implication bodysuit (15960) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication cock_warmer (240) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication babydoll (850) -> clothing (2079775)
create implication nightgown (2843) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication basque (84) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication tutu (615) -> clothing (2079775)

Reason: Clothing is implied through another implication

EDIT: The bulk update request #8158 (forum #405473) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

alphamule

Privileged

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #8158 is active.

remove implication bodysuit (15960) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication cock_warmer (240) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication babydoll (850) -> clothing (2079775)
create implication nightgown (2843) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication basque (84) -> clothing (2079775)
remove implication tutu (615) -> clothing (2079775)

Reason: Clothing is implied through another implication

nightgown doesn't imply clothing? Oh sorry, misread that. It's CREATING one, not removing.
What about dancewear?
Should that imply clothing?

  • 1