The tag implication #63193 female_rimming_male -> rimming_male has been rejected.

Reason: In the name

EDIT: The tag implication female_rimming_male -> rimming_male (forum #406026) has been rejected by @orphan_crippler.

is ambiguous, and can be interpreted as a male doing the rimming rather than being rimmed. More generally, we want to avoid legitimizing more x_verbing_y tags because it's an explosive tag combination, when separate x_verbing and y_verbed tags are largely just as functional, making the combo tag unnecessary and redundant.

The tag implication female_rimming_male -> rimming_male (forum #406026) has been rejected by @orphan_crippler.