The tag implication #63656 pivoted_ears -> ears has been rejected.

Reason: A post with pivoted_ears (e.g: implicated by ears_back or ears_down) doesn't actually implicate having ears, but it should.

EDIT: The tag implication pivoted_ears -> ears (forum #406766) has been rejected by @Atlas-Vega.

atlas-vega said:
The tag implication #63656 pivoted_ears -> ears has been rejected.

Reason: A post with pivoted_ears (e.g: implicated by ears_back or ears_down) doesn't actually implicate having ears, but it should.

Ears by itself is not a valid tag.

Oh no, you're right; I really should have checked but didn't think to. I think that was a bit careless considering I made a post about a tag, sorry.

Is there no way to remove these after posting?

atlas-vega said:
Is there no way to remove these after posting?

You can reject it here: implication #63656

The tag implication pivoted_ears -> ears (forum #406766) has been rejected by @Atlas-Vega.

waydence said:
You can reject it here: implication #63656

Thank you!