Topic: Audible_knotting

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

It's not self explanatory. What about it? Are you asking to create this tag? Are you sharing that you like audible knots?

aaronfranke said:
It's not self explanatory. What about it? Are you asking to create this tag? Are you sharing that you like audible knots?

Apologies. This is my first time requesting a tag be made is all. I was told on the discord to make a post here because it's audio related.

stavinair_caeruleum said:
Apologies. This is my first time requesting a tag be made is all. I was told on the discord to make a post here because it's audio related.

Anyone has permissions to create a tag, you don't need to request it. Just go to the posts you have in mind and add the tag.

Watsit

Privileged

aaronfranke said:
Anyone has permissions to create a tag, you don't need to request it. Just go to the posts you have in mind and add the tag.

It's still a good idea to ask if you're not sure if a tag is appropriate. People can and do get in trouble for deciding to make a tag and then start mass tagging it without discussion, when the tag turns out to be inappropriate. See the recent teletubbies/slendytubbies tags someone thought was a good idea.

In this case, audible_knotting does follow along with audible_creampie, so it doesn't seem out of place compared to what's already here. We probably want to avoid making too many audible_* tags though, since anything can be made audible in a video, and it's probably enough to have a tag indicating a sound more generally, be it text in a static image (e.g. POP! written/typed alongside an image of knotting) or an audible sound effect in a video.

watsit said:
It's still a good idea to ask if you're not sure if a tag is appropriate. People can and do get in trouble for deciding to make a tag and then start mass tagging it without discussion, when the tag turns out to be inappropriate. See the recent teletubbies/slendytubbies tags someone thought was a good idea.

In this case, audible_knotting does follow along with audible_creampie, so it doesn't seem out of place compared to what's already here. We probably want to avoid making too many audible_* tags though, since anything can be made audible in a video, and it's probably enough to have a tag indicating a sound more generally, be it text in a static image (e.g. POP! written/typed alongside an image of knotting) or an audible sound effect in a video.

We could rename the audible_* tags to *_sound_effect, and their original purpose can just be searched with sound *_sound_effect

aaronfranke said:
Anyone has permissions to create a tag, you don't need to request it. Just go to the posts you have in mind and add the tag.

Tags should still be discussed, we're trying to avoid the absolute disasters that some of our most prolific taggers have caused, disasters that we're still cleaning up a year later, and will continue cleaning up for the next several years

  • 1