Some suggestions of shorter versions that could make tagging easier/faster (less risks of typos):

• fat_male / fat_female → Overweight_male / Overweight_female
• Separately suggested here
• big_dom / small_dom → big_dom_small_sub / small_dom_big_sub
• Alternatively bigger_dom / smaller_dom
• two_doms / two_subs → Two_doms_one_sub / two_subs_one_dom

I think I had more ideas originally, but they are slipping from memory at the moment.

Circeus said:
Some suggestions of shorter versions that could make tagging easier/faster (less risks of typos):

• fat_male / fat_female → Overweight_male / Overweight_female
• Separately suggested here
• big_dom / small_dom → big_dom_small_sub / small_dom_big_sub
• Alternatively bigger_dom / smaller_dom
• two_doms / two_subs → Two_doms_one_sub / two_subs_one_dom

I think I had more ideas originally, but they are slipping from memory at the moment.

Problem with fat is that it is commonly used for all forms of higher non healthy weight. As such I fear wed get a flood of misstags if fat was allowed.

on positions/roles large_dom and large_sub seem more suitable to me, sence size is primary while role is secondary in these tags.

The tags for the number of subs and doms on the other hand can't be shortened as the specify both the the number of doms and subs in a single group, not one or the other.

Ruku said:
Problem with fat is that it is commonly used for all forms of higher non healthy weight. As such I fear wed get a flood of misstags if fat was allowed.

All of the 'more than slightly chubby' tags are implicated to overweight. So I don't see how it'd cause mistags.

Ruku said:
The tags for the number of subs and doms on the other hand can't be shortened as the specify both the the number of doms and subs in a single group, not one or the other.

You realize the two tags in questions are literally the only tags that count them? Anything with more characters than that has been systematically aliased to orgy and is treated under gangbang anyway, so "two subs" fatally implies "one dom" because there's no point doing a higher count in the first place anyway: such counts translate to "orgy" if sex is involved (as all -some tags higher than three already do, or at something more specifically useful to tag anyway, like parallel_sex), or are just not that useful if it isn't (i.e. hardly more specific than, say domination alone).

I've been puzzled by the chubby tag before. One would think tagging chubby is valid when we have the slightly_chubby tag. How about it being aliased to overweight instead?

Sorrowless said:
I've been puzzled by the chubby tag before. One would think tagging chubby is valid when we have the slightly_chubby tag. How about it being aliased to overweight instead?

here the chubby tag has always been meant for characters with only a little bit of extra fat but it was aliased to slightly chubby to give a hint for people kept using it for literally everything ranging from overweight to hyper fat.

bumping for more eyes. Still think those tags would be useful.