18+_adults_only_sign
What do you folks think? Is this a tag we need, or should we alias it away?

I mean, it's a visual element that's present, I don't see any benefit to getting rid of it. I'd change the name to just 18+_sign or adults_only_sign though, the current tag name is weirdly long.

nimphia said:
I mean, it's a visual element that's present, I don't see any benefit to getting rid of it. I'd change the name to just 18+_sign or adults_only_sign though, the current tag name is weirdly long.

I'll go with the latter, there may be the odd case where there are different ages of majority (so 20+ or others)

Wait a minute there's age restriction, it could be aliased to/from that. I thought about implication, but I don't think there's enough distinction between the two for both to stay

Maturity rating

snpthecat said:
I'll go with the latter, there may be the odd case where there are different ages of majority (so 20+ or others)

Wait a minute there's age restriction, it could be aliased to/from that. I thought about implication, but I don't think there's enough distinction between the two for both to stay

+1 for aliasing it to age restriction.

How about "age restriction mark"?
Slightly longer, but makes it more explicit that it's referring to a sign or symbol put onto the art.

My only observation is that wherever this ends up, the wiki page should mention the "18 with red circle-slash" sign as an example. I find it to be relatively common on some social media bios/profiles, including Twitter and Mastodon, and I've occasionally seen it other places, like FA profiles.

Looking at the current posts here, only post #2503018 seems to have it, but I still think it's worth mentioning.