The bulk update request #8605 is pending approval.

remove implication jynx (340) -> generation_1_pokemon (148569)
mass update jynx -> jynx_(pokemon)
create implication jynx_(pokemon) (0) -> generation_1_pokemon (148569)
create alias jinx (2) -> jinx_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias jinx_(character) (6) -> jinx_(disambiguation) (0)
change category jinx_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: There are various characters named Jynx (and Jinx too).

https://e621.net/tags?search%5Bname_matches%5D=jynx_*
https://e621.net/tags?search%5Bname_matches%5D=jinx_*

Followup:

alias jynx -> jynx_(disambiguation)
alias jynx_(character) -> jynx_(disambiguation)
alias jynx_(oc) -> jynx_(disambiguation)
category jynx_(disambiguation) -> invalid

Maybe, but there seem to be very few past cases of a character named Jynx being mistagged as the Pokemon. This disambiguation might be more of a nuisance for people trying to tag the Pokemon than actually helpful.

Wasn't this a DC comics character? Batman series?

alphamule said:
Wasn't this a DC comics character? Batman series?

that's Jinx with an i, although looking at it that's actually seemingly two characters with two distinct designs, actually _{(not including slightly different effectively identical incarnations from other universes)}. there's the bald Indian sorceress with elemental powers, there's the pink-haired, grey-skinned goth Halloween witch with probability manipulation powers.

wonder if we should have two separate tags for both of these, but seeing as one design is _way_ more well known, there's probably not much of a point.