The tag implication #63946 oral_orgasm -> orgasm has been approved.

Reason: It's literally in the name of the tag.

EDIT: The tag implication oral_orgasm -> orgasm (forum #408755) has been approved by @spe.

Should this be aliased to oral_orgasm like how orgasm_from_anal is aliased to anal_orgasm?

donovan_dmc said:
Should this be aliased to oral_orgasm like how orgasm_from_anal is aliased to anal_orgasm?

That makes sense.

https://e621.net/meta_searches/tags?name=orgasm_from_oral&commit=Go
What about the hands-free implication, as well?

BTW: Probably should have a link to Wiki next to "HAS TRANSITIVES".

donovan_dmc said:
Should this be aliased to oral_orgasm like how orgasm_from_anal is aliased to anal_orgasm?

Yea, better. 'Orgasm from oral' made me think that the one receiving is having an orgasm, had to check the wiki for this to click. oral_orgasm could also be misunderstood, but looks like anal_orgasm is clean. Should work out.

While looking at this, I noticed oral_orgasm implies hands-free but anal_orgasm doesn't. Does that seem wrong somehow?

spe said:
While looking at this, I noticed oral_orgasm implies hands-free but anal_orgasm doesn't. Does that seem wrong somehow?

The wiki for hands-free directly mentions anal penetration, so yeah it might best be added

The bulk update request #9548 is active.

create implication anal_orgasm (28410) -> hands-free (51601)

Reason: Given above
Though I wonder if anal/oral_orgasm means exclusively anal/oral stimulation, if it doesn't, it may not necessarily be hands-free. Should it be restricted?

EDIT: The bulk update request #9548 (forum #423182) has been approved by @spe.

spe said:
While looking at this, I noticed oral_orgasm implies hands-free but anal_orgasm doesn't. Does that seem wrong somehow?

uhh... yeah, but also-- I dunno... oral orgasm (and other similar stuff) kinda feels _more_ "hands-free". feels like there should be a "hands-freer", almost.

The tag implication oral_orgasm -> orgasm (forum #408755) has been approved by @spe.

snpthecat said:
Though I wonder if anal/oral_orgasm means exclusively anal/oral stimulation, in which case it may not necessarily be hands-free. Should it be restricted?

I'd say yes. The point of the tags is to indicate a character cumming from anal/oral stimulation, rather than merely during anal/oral stimulation. So if there can also be direct penile stimulation, the character isn't strictly cumming from anal/oral stimulation, and the tags shouldn't apply.

watsit said:
I'd say yes. The point of the tags is to indicate a character cumming from anal/oral stimulation, rather than merely during anal/oral stimulation. So if there can also be direct penile stimulation, the character isn't strictly cumming from anal/oral stimulation, and the tags shouldn't apply.

This is what I was thinking. Anal/oral penetration tags already exist that cover that kind of stimulation, and cum_while_penetrated can be used for any case where the penetrated character orgasms regardless of whether or not it's hands-free or due to exclusively anal or oral stimulation.

Side note: while we're at it, cum_while_penetrated should probably be changed to orgasm_while_penetrated so as to cover female/andromorph orgasms as well, no?

The bulk update request #9548 (forum #423182) has been approved by @spe.

dba_afish said:
uhh... yeah, but also-- I dunno... oral orgasm (and other similar stuff) kinda feels _more_ "hands-free". feels like there should be a "hands-freer", almost.

I guess because anal can provide direct sexual stimulation while oral does not... perhaps there could be an entirely different tag for that, which also implies hands-free? No idea what to call it, though.
At least in real-life, as far as I know, this kind of orgasm is basically only possible through what you might call psychological stimulation, which is even possible in the absence of any stimulation.

spe said:
I guess because anal can provide direct sexual stimulation while oral does not... perhaps there could be an entirely different tag for that, which also implies hands-free? No idea what to call it, though.

There is spontaneous_ejaculation for a character ejaculating without apparent stimulation.
post #5059090 post #4157424

Although I'm not sure I like the idea of it including stimulation, even if it excludes genital stimulation (e.g. the lips), as that seems to be straying from what makes the tag interesting.

dba_afish said:
uhh... yeah, but also-- I dunno... oral orgasm (and other similar stuff) kinda feels _more_ "hands-free". feels like there should be a "hands-freer", almost.

I get what you mean. Ants is in this sort of grey area where it's sometimes counted as part of the genitalia extended group. For example, the opening sentence of

oral:
A character stimulating genitals using their mouth (including the anus).