The bulk update request #8767 is pending approval.

remove implication hugging_penis (1962) -> hugging_another (7917)

Reason: many posts of exist of characters hugging their own penis: hugging_penis solo -- hugging_another is only to be tagged if there are two characters in the scene

the interface will not allow me to create the implication hugging_penis->hug since hugging_penis->hugging_another already implicates hug, even though i am proposing to delete the implication (I believe this is a bug?) but i would like to create that implication as well.

tokwas said:
Reason: many posts of exist of characters hugging their own penis: hugging_penis solo

Should this be changed to hugging_own_penis? I can imagine it being a relevant distinction to some people if the penis being hugged is the character's own or not, and various <verb>_<thing> tags have a corresponding <verb>_own_<thing> to distinguish it.

The bulk update request #8768 is pending approval.

create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> self_hug (194)
create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> penis (1578441)
create implication hugging_own_tail (28) -> self_hug (194)
create implication hugging_own_tail (28) -> tail (1405549)

Reason: Separating hugging another character’s penis and hugging one’s own.

Edit: added the same implications for the tail

watsit said:
Should this be changed to hugging_own_penis? I can imagine it being a relevant distinction to some people if the penis being hugged is the character's own or not, and various <verb>_<thing> tags have a corresponding <verb>_own_<thing> to distinguish it.

But that would still imply hugging_penis, no? They're hugging a penis, even if it's their own.

dimoretpinel said:
The bulk update request #8768 is pending approval.

create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> self_hug (194)
create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> penis (1578441)
create implication hugging_own_tail (28) -> self_hug (194)
create implication hugging_own_tail (28) -> tail (1405549)

I'm not sure that hugging one's own penis counts as a hug, a hug is pretty explicitly shared between two or more different people, self_hug would be more appropriate if anything.

dirtyderg said:
But that would still imply hugging_penis, no? They're hugging a penis, even if it's their own.

They're sometimes kept separate if it's between doing it to themself vs another. autofellatio (which implies penile_masturbation) doesn't imply fellatio (which implies sex), even though a character is performing fellatio in both cases. Or self_hug which doesn't imply hug, even though a character is hugging something in both.

pankino2002 said:
I'm not sure that hugging one's own penis counts as a hug, a hug is pretty explicitly shared between two or more different people, self_hug would be more appropriate if anything.

BUR has been edited, thank you :)

The bulk update request #9278 is pending approval.

create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> self_hug (194)
create implication hugging_own_penis (39) -> hugging_penis (1962)
create implication hugging_another's_penis (90) -> hugging_another (7917)
create implication hugging_another's_penis (90) -> hugging_penis (1962)

Reason: Might as well have hugging_another's_penis too and have hugging_penis as an umbrella for both. OP's BUR would have to be done first

Also:

imply hugging_penis -> hug

The bulk update request #9279 is pending approval.

create implication self_hug (194) -> hug (56019)

Reason: I see no reason for self_hug to not imply hug personally. If hugging objects is hugging, why not hugging yourself. But, separate BUR in case this is controversial

Or I guess we could instead name it hugging_self if that sounds more cohesive