Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: purple_crown_(cult_of_the_lamb) -> cult_of_the_lamb

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The tag implication #64252 purple_crown_(cult_of_the_lamb) -> cult_of_the_lamb has been approved.

Reason: Right now, the red_crown_(cult_of_the_lamb) is recognized as a character and implicated to Cult of the Lamb. Given the recent implication of the goat (cult of the lamb), it would make sense for the same thing to happen to their equivalent of the red crown.

EDIT: The tag implication purple_crown_(cult_of_the_lamb) -> cult_of_the_lamb (forum #410366) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

Small issue: isn’t the purple crown’s Shamura’s?
The one with the moon shaped eye.

post #3682674

Maybe there should be a separate tag for their crown and the goat’s.
It has an eye shaped like the lamb’s red crown’s eye.

post #4866405

Updated

dimoretpinel said:
Small issue: isn’t the purple crown’s Shamura’s?
The one with the moon shaped eye.

post #3682674

Maybe there should be a separate tag for their crown and the goat’s.
It has an eye shaped like the lamb’s red crown’s eye.

post #4866405

A difference I can think of is that in opposit to the crowns of the Lamb and the Goat Shamura's crown remains static (just like Leshy's, Kallamar's and Heket's). It doesn't seem to be alive like the Red Crown and thus wouldn't qualify for a character tag.
Also, looking through Shamura's tag his crown only appears twice. Do we really need a seperate tag for that?

  • 1