Forum - Rimming implications

Topic: Rimming implications

Member

create implication male_rimming_male (1999) -> male_rimming (759)
create implication male_rimming_male (1999) -> rimming_male (1601)
create implication male_rimming_female (970) -> male_rimming (759)
create implication male_rimming_female (970) -> rimming_female (255)
create implication female_rimming_female (414) -> female_rimming (516)
create implication female_rimming_female (414) -> rimming_female (255)
create implication female_rimming_male (2500) -> female_rimming (516) # duplicate of implication #64255
create implication female_rimming_male (2500) -> rimming_male (1601)
create implication rimming_female (255) -> rimming (30298)
create implication rimming_male (1601) -> rimming (30298)
create implication female_rimming (516) -> rimming (30298)
create implication male_rimming (759) -> rimming (30298)
create implication rimming (30298) -> oral (300466) # duplicate of implication #53

Reason: None of these have implications as far as I can tell

.x_rimming_y should be aliased away to avoid more x_verbing_y combo tags. Either to x/y or x_rimming. rimming_female and rimming_male are somewhat ambiguous, whether it's referring to the sex doing the rimming or being rimmed, and would be better as male_rimmed and female_rimmed (along with herm, gynomorph, andromorph, maleherm, intersex, and ambiguous).

Topic: Rimming implications