The tag implication #64294 hextaur -> long_taur has been approved.

Reason: numerical(3) variant of a long taur.

EDIT: The tag implication hextaur -> long_taur (forum #410887) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #8848 is active.

create implication hextaur (47) -> hexapod (121)

Reason: Relevant

EDIT: The bulk update request #8848 (forum #410888) has been approved by @spe.

dimoretpinel said:
The bulk update request #8848 is active.

create implication hextaur (47) -> hexapod (121)

Reason: Relevant

I'm not so sure we should imply species to a characteristic. There's the problem of the species being identifiable, but say one of its legs is offscreen, so 6 legs wouldn't be applicable. Another scenario could be amputation, so they no longer have 6 legs.

And even if these examples don't count, the better alias destination is hexapod instead, since the wiki for 6_legs requires that it be unusual for them to have 6 legs

snpthecat said:
I'm not so sure we should imply species to a characteristic.

But the whole thing about hextaurs is that they have 6 legs. The species tag is named after the amount of legs. Due to TWYS, it would be weird to use the hextaur tag instead of just "taur" if the 6 legs are offscreen.

I can edit the BUR to "hexapod" instead.

dimoretpinel said:
But the whole thing about hextaurs is that they have 6 legs. The species tag is named after the amount of legs. Due to TWYS, it would be weird to use the hextaur tag instead of just "taur" if the 6 legs are offscreen.

Yeah, I don't see why this tag would get used if there wasn't a hexapod visible and taggable, barring mistags.

The tag implication hextaur -> long_taur (forum #410887) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #8848 (forum #410888) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #9052 is pending approval.

remove implication hextaur (47) -> taur (18650)

Reason: Implied through long taur