Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #64444 cow_print_thigh_highs -> thigh_highs has been rejected.
Reason: Cow print thigh highs are thigh highs.
EDIT: The tag implication cow_print_thigh_highs -> thigh_highs (forum #415744) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
I think an implication to pattern_thigh_highs would be better.
demonthedarkhound said:
I think an implication to pattern_thigh_highs would be better.
+1 This
demonthedarkhound said:
I think an implication to pattern_thigh_highs would be better.
Or animal print thigh highs, then equip that tag with an implication to pattern thigh highs (and animal print), mirroring cow print bikini
snpthecat said:
Or animal print thigh highs, then equip that tag with an implication to pattern thigh highs (and animal print), mirroring cow print bikini
Yea, that's even better.
The bulk update request #9019 is active.
create implication animal_print_thigh_highs (623) -> animal_print (8602)
create implication animal_print_thigh_highs (623) -> pattern_thigh_highs (3399)
create implication cheetah_print_thigh_highs (0) -> cheetah_print (151)
create implication cheetah_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication cow_print_thigh_highs (598) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication giraffe_print_bikini (0) -> giraffe_print (124)
create implication giraffe_print_bikini (0) -> animal_print_bikini (1714)
create implication giraffe_print_thigh_highs (0) -> giraffe_print (124)
create implication giraffe_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication jaguar_print_thigh_highs (0) -> jaguar_print (44)
create implication jaguar_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication leopard_print_thigh_highs (0) -> leopard_print (566)
create implication leopard_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication tiger_print_thigh_highs (0) -> tiger_print (393)
create implication tiger_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
create implication zebra_print_thigh_highs (0) -> zebra_print (176)
create implication zebra_print_thigh_highs (0) -> animal_print_thigh_highs (623)
Reason: cow_print_thigh_highs is a popular tag, and animal_print_bikini tags are also fairly used, but cow_print_thigh_highs doesn't currently imply thigh_highs.
Creating implications for animal_print_thigh_highs to mirror animal_print_bikini which is implied to by various *_print_bikini tags.
Creating implications for other *_print_thigh_highs tags to their *_print tags.
Also saw that giraffe_print_bikini was missing implications like the other *_print_bikini tags.
EDIT: The bulk update request #9019 (forum #415921) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
Oh, shit. Discovered the existence of print_clothing tags.
Would it be more accurate to implicate animal_print_thigh_highs to pattern_thigh_highs or print_thigh_highs?
animal_print_bikini implicates pattern_bikini but print_bikini also exists which is confusing.
I don't really know what to do with pattern/print.
It would kinda make sense to me to have pattern imply print. Like a pattern, by definition, is repeating, while a print doesn't necessarily. Animal prints tend to be somewhat random, not cleanly repeating, so keeping that part as-is seems fine.
Only problem is that all the implication trees would have to be reworked to make pattern consistently imply print.
The tag implication cow_print_thigh_highs -> thigh_highs (forum #415744) has been rejected by @spe.
The bulk update request #9019 (forum #415921) has been approved by @spe.
