The bulk update request #9083 is pending approval.

create implication ai_generated_background (238) -> ai_assisted (263)
create implication ai_generated_audio (100) -> ai_assisted (263)
create implication ai_generated_reference (22) -> ai_assisted (263)
create alias ai_interpolation (2) -> ai_generated_frames (0)
create implication ai_generated_frames (0) -> ai_assisted (263)
change category ai_generated_frames (0) -> artist
create alias ai_voice (96) -> ai_generated_voice (0)
create alias ai_cover (5) -> ai_generated_voice (0)
create implication ai_generated_voice (0) -> ai_generated_audio (100)
change category ai_generated_voice (0) -> artist

Reason: Many posts tagged with AI involvement such as backgrounds or voices are not tagged under ai_assisted. (Background Search / Audio search)
These implications allow users to search/blacklist ai_assisted and see/block all posts that had AI involve in any way.

Additionally:

• Changing ai_interpolation to ai_generated_frames to make it clearer to users who don't know the term 'interpolation'.
• Aliasing ai_voice and ai_cover to ai_generated_voice.

Some overlap with: topic #44528 and topic #44285

dirtyderg said:
create implication ai_generated_reference (16) -> ai_assisted (180)

This sounds like it can refer to a fully AI generated model_sheet/character reference, not merely AI assisted.

dirtyderg said:

• Changing ai_interpolation to ai_generated_frames to make it clearer to users who don't know the term 'interpolation'.

ai_generated_frames sounds like it could also apply to in-betweens of a static/non-animated sequence, or even fully AI generated video, which wouldn't be the same as ai_interpolation.

dirtyderg said:

• Aliasing ai_voice and ai_cover to ai_generated_voice.

ai_cover sounds like it could refer to an AI generated cover_page, or an AI interpretation of a music track that doesn't necessarily have vocals/voice.

watsit said:
This sounds like it can refer to a fully AI generated model_sheet/character reference, not merely AI assisted.

They'll make that mistag no matter the existence of the implication. The implication won't make a difference on whether the tag(s) will be appropriately replaced with ai_generated. This is an outsized amount of concern over a specific scenario in the intersection of two things (deleted images and ai images) that e6 and vast majority of the userbase do not care about.

watsit, from topic #44285 said:
ai_generated_reference could refer to a character reference/model_sheet being fully AI generated, not merely AI assisted. Granted such an image wouldn't be allowed, but even deleted posts keep their tags. What are the rules for implications that can cause valid tags to generate mistags, but for posts that are likely to be deleted?

ai_generated_reference would not be a valid tag in that scenario because the tag would be referring to reference_image and would not apply to model_sheet and certainly would not apply to both.