Topic: Remove alias from 'm to 'm_(ff)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

So there's glitched Charizard ('m_(FF)), a glitched pokemon that looks exactly the same as (non-ghost/fossil) MissingNo. ('m_(00)), and a glitched pokemon that looks like an upside-down (non-ghost/fossil) MissingNo. ('m_(FE)). I question how likely anyone is to draw the non-Charizard ones... is what I would say if I hadn't checked the posts:

post #2764438 <- contains 'm_(FF) (glitch Charizard) and what I think might be 'm_(00)? They're both labeled m', which might be a typo?
post #2563242 <- 'm_(00), which took the substitute_doll form after being transferred to Pokemon Stadium

So, +1

lafcadio said:
The bulk update request #9207 is pending approval.

remove alias 'm (0) -> 'm_(ff) (17)

Reason: as explained previously, there are three 'm

not sure why you didn't make this BUR yourself though

It's their first post, and the BUR system is not exactly friendly to first timers

crocogator said:
So there's glitched Charizard ('m_(FF)), a glitched pokemon that looks exactly the same as (non-ghost/fossil) MissingNo. ('m_(00)), and a glitched pokemon that looks like an upside-down (non-ghost/fossil) MissingNo. ('m_(FE)). I question how likely anyone is to draw the non-Charizard ones... is what I would say if I hadn't checked the posts:

post #2764438 <- contains 'm_(FF) (glitch Charizard) and what I think might be 'm_(00)? They're both labeled m', which might be a typo?
post #2563242 <- 'm_(00), which took the substitute_doll form after being transferred to Pokemon Stadium

So, +1

Correcting the typo is how I found out about the alias, since my attempts to replace m' with 'm caused the latter to disappear. :þ

  • 1