The tag implication #64996 no_helmet_imp_midna -> midna has been rejected.

Reason: fairly common visual variant of midna, but not true form midna, in which she does not wear her distinct helmet. Given that it is still midna, it should imply the original character tag as well.

EDIT: The tag implication no_helmet_imp_midna -> midna (forum #420868) has been rejected by @spe.

should that even be a tag? it's not a different form of her, it's just her without her helmet on

Better as an alias. We don't need separate character tags for a character simply not wearing a helmet. But even if it somehow should, the tags shouldn't imply the normal version for searchability reasons (same reason midna_(true_form) doesn't imply midna).

The tag implication no_helmet_imp_midna -> midna (forum #420868) has been rejected by @spe.