hi there.

so recently i came across a post on latias with tentacles and something struck me wrong. op tagged the post with cum_inflation, cum_in_pussy, etc etc except there was no visible cum around, just a round bulge in the tentacle with liquid and sfxs confirming said liquid. and if you look in the description it reads:

People say that legendaries can't get pregnant. That doesn't mean we can't pump one so full she's round and swollen to try!

...basically confirming its cum.

im very familiar with twys and this was a question i never asked myself till now. my question is, would the description of the post count for cum, even if the liquid is not readily present in the scene? i wanna correct it but i dont wanna incorrectly do it and follow the footsteps in the future. if you're still confused, post #5094828 is the one thats puzzling me.

(ps: the tagging was done by op, i checked.)

Nah that doesn't count as cum, you can't see it. I wonder if it would even qualify for ambiguous fluids ((actually we don't see any fluids, so it can't even be that) it also looks like it could be egg transfer)

Description isn't considered under twys.

snpthecat said:
Nah that doesn't count as cum, you can't see it. I wonder if it would even qualify for ambiguous fluids.

Description isn't considered under twys.

hell yeah! thanks for confirming my doubts

okc said:
hell yeah! thanks for confirming my doubts

One more thing, if they revert the tag changes, don't get into a tag war, report the post instead