The bulk update request #9381 has been rejected.

create alias leg_around_partner (75) -> leg_wrap (5181)
create alias legs_around_partner (776) -> leg_wrap (5181)
create alias leg_wrap (5181) -> legs_enfolding (0)
create alias wrapping (255) -> wraps (16404)
create alias arm_wrapping (582) -> arm_wraps (4292)
mass update tail_wrapping -> tail_wrapping_(disambiguation)
mass update leg_wrapping -> leg_wrapping_(disambiguation)
mass update wrapped_legs -> wrapped_legs_(disambiguation)
mass update wrapped_leg -> wrapped_leg_(disambiguation)
change category tail_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category leg_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category wrapped_legs_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category wrapped_leg_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: okay, this one is a bit weird. leg_wrap is mainly used for a character wrapping their legs around another's body, but is too similar to leg_wraps. it should be aliased to legs_enfolding which is a better tag that specifies the action, and as most posts are the action searching the tag with clothing/wraps and cleaning it up should get a lot if not most incorrect tagging. as for the leg_around_partner aliases they are pretty much identical to leg_wrap.

here's some bonus wrapping related stuff. wrapping and arm_wrapping are pretty much the same as the more populated aliases. tail_wrapping specifically needs to be disambiguated as it's used for and can easily mean two different things, and leg_wrapping while non-existent could just as easily be used in the same way. similar to the latter is wrapped_legs, it's tagged only for the clothing, all on the character death_(puss_in_boots). lets also disambiguate the singular form while we're at it too.

EDIT: The bulk update request #9381 (forum #420899) has been rejected by @Dinbyy.

uh oh, its posted despite there being errors.

dinbyy said:
uh oh, its posted despite there being errors.

i think i see the error? leg_wrap can't be involved in being aliased to and the alias for another tag simultaneously in a request. and the disambiguated tags need to be aliased to their disambiguates, not updated.

The bulk update request #9381 (forum #420899) has been rejected by @Dinbyy.

The bulk update request #9382 is pending approval.

create alias leg_around_partner (75) -> leg_wrap-around (0)
create alias legs_around_partner (776) -> leg_wrap-around (0)
mass update leg_wrap -> leg_wrap-around
create alias wrappings (847) -> wraps (16404)
create alias arm_wrapping (582) -> arm_wraps (4292)
create alias wrapping (255) -> wrapping_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias tail_wrapping (250) -> tail_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias leg_wrapping (0) -> leg_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias wrapped_legs (190) -> wrapped_legs_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias wrapped_leg (0) -> wrapped_leg_(disambiguation) (0)
change category wrapping_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category tail_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category leg_wrapping_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category wrapped_legs_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
change category wrapped_leg_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: lets try this again. changed legs_enfolding to leg_wrap-around as it's a more understandable term. also added wrapping to be disambiguated as its very vague, being used for body parts wrapping around or the cloth.

dinbyy said:
leg_wrap can't be involved in being aliased to and the alias for another tag simultaneously in a request.

Yep

and the disambiguated tags need to be aliased to their disambiguates, not updated.

Yep

However the reason behind the BTR (blocking transitive relationships) are the active aliases leg wrap has.

btw You can edit the BUR, you don't need to make a new one.