The tag implication #65007 male_rimming_male -> rimming has been rejected.

Reason: A male licking another male's anus is rimming.

EDIT: The tag implication male_rimming_male -> rimming (forum #421019) has been rejected by @spe.

We're trying to avoid more <x>_<verbing>_<y> tags beyond penetrating, since it creates a lot of tags when considering all possible combinations. It's better to have separate <x>_<verbing> and <y>_<verbed> tags instead, which results in fewer overall tags and would work good enough.

But even if not, proper implications here would be to male_rimming and male_rimmed, and those would imply rimming instead.

watsit said:
We're trying to avoid more <x>_<verbing>_<y> tags beyond penetrating, since it creates a lot of tags when considering all possible combinations. It's better to have separate <x>_<verbing> and <y>_<verbed> tags instead, which results in fewer overall tags and would work good enough.

But even if not, proper implications here would be to male_rimming and male_rimmed, and those would imply rimming instead.

About that issue, would it be possible for a tag to be aliased to 2 tags ? A tag being automatically separated in 2. Like in this case male_rimming_male -> male_rimming and male_rimmed.
The double aliased tag could then still be used as a shortcuts to add both tags ... oh and it could also work in search.

mikael_the_d said:
About that issue, would it be possible for a tag to be aliased to 2 tags ?

Unfortunately not. A tag can only be aliased to one tag at a time.

The tag implication male_rimming_male -> rimming (forum #421019) has been rejected by @spe.