I know this is going to seem dumb because it's something unusual to find on the site, so I thought I'd ask anyway, sorry.

Since the rule is clear "solo Humans are not relevant to the site, but humanoids are ok"

But the question here is: Can furry characters or original species that have human skin tone (no fur) be considered irrelevant? Or does it fall within the category of "humanoids" ?
remember: 100% non-human creatures with human skin color
the same goes for feral with human faces (sphinx/chimera and or mystical stuff related)

Having fur is not a requirement for a character to count as "furry".
anthro
feral
humanoid
taur

lafcadio said:
Having fur is not a requirement for a character to count as "furry".
anthro
feral
humanoid
taur

Thank you so much!!

erinkondoh said:
I know this is going to seem dumb because it's something unusual to find on the site, so I thought I'd ask anyway, sorry.

Since the rule is clear "solo Humans are not relevant to the site, but humanoids are ok"

But the question here is: Can furry characters or original species that have human skin tone (no fur) be considered irrelevant? Or does it fall within the category of "humanoids" ?
remember: 100% non-human creatures with human skin color
the same goes for feral with human faces (sphinx/chimera and or mystical stuff related)

rip pigs or apes if what you said was true.

dinbyy said:
rip pigs or apes if what you said was true.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to see this type of content and if you find it, it has a lot of downvotes, which is a bit strange by the way.....
and I don't know if its really true but apes are really a rare kind