Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: ninjakitty_(cat) -> ninjakitty_(character)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

NXTangl

Member

The tag implication #65451 ninjakitty_(cat) -> ninjakitty_(character) has been rejected.

Reason: ninjakitty_(character) has both an animal_humanoid form and a silly chibi cat form. In the interest of TWYS, I believe we should tag the chibi cat separately...although since ninjakitty draws the chibi cat more often, maybe we should have that be the default and make the humanoid version ninjakitty_(humanoid)?

EDIT: The tag implication ninjakitty_(cat) -> ninjakitty_(character) (forum #422188) has been rejected by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

Manitka

Member

snpthecat said:
I believe we don't imply alternate forms to one another

Honestly though those characters look nothing alike I don’t even know if those are supposed to be the same character from looking at it.

Might be best to just give them new tag names.

But yeah shouldn’t imply the other one

  • 1