The tag implication #65464 peanut_beta_pokemon -> beta_pokemon_(species) has been approved.

Reason: look at this cute little mf

post #5124196

EDIT: The tag implication peanut_beta_pokemon -> beta_pokemon_(species) (forum #422378) has been approved by @slyroon.

peanut_beta_pokemon doesn't fellow the naming style of other beta pokemon, which is typically either beta_* for a beta version of an existing mon (e.g. beta_cacturne) or just the name for altogether scrapped mon (e.g. warabbit). Since peanut would be ambiguous, peanut_(beta_pokemon) would be a better tag, IMO.

watsit said:
peanut_beta_pokemon doesn't fellow the naming style of other beta pokemon, which is typically either beta_* for a beta version of an existing mon (e.g. beta_cacturne) or just the name for altogether scrapped mon (e.g. warabbit). Since peanut would be ambiguous, peanut_(beta_pokemon) would be a better tag, IMO.

Well, "Peanut" doesn’t seem to be the official name as far as I can tell, so it wouldn’t make sense to name the tag as if it was. The current option seems fine, though it could later be replaced with a fanon name if one ever gains prominence.

peanuts are also known as goobers https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut

can we call it a Goober

or how about "Gubadino" that's what google translate says when you put in "goober dino"

fliphook said:
peanuts are also known as goobers https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut

can we call it a Goober

or how about "Gubadino" that's what google translate says when you put in "goober dino"

Cute, but trying to impose a name out of the blue on something that's already spread across the internet might just cause more confusion.

The tag implication peanut_beta_pokemon -> beta_pokemon_(species) (forum #422378) has been approved by @slyroon.