Topic: Tag alias: half-naked -> half_naked

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I'm not sure what half_naked is supposed to be used for in the first place. Maybe both of these ought to be aliased somewhere else.

spe said:
I'm not sure what half_naked is supposed to be used for in the first place. Maybe both of these ought to be aliased somewhere else.

Apparently, it's supposed to be a disambiguation page of sorts. Perhaps we ought to formalize it as one with a _(disambiguation) so that people know it's supposed to be cleaned up.

watsit said:
partially_clothed and mostly_nude already exist, and honestly are confusingly similar, and neither really indicate how much clothing there can still be.

Differentiating between a character that is just wearing a scarf for example that does not cover anything versus a character wearing fullbody clothing versus a character wearing fullbody clothing that however is unbuttoned(not worn in its secured/proper/full state) for example exposing the chest or crotch.

Those I do think are valid differences to tag for, however the tags intended to cover these do have the worst possible naming that is literally akin to the glass-half-full vs glass-half-empty state, without reading the wiki they mean the same thing.

I feel like it might be wise to repurpose partially_clothed for all states of partial undress rather than the current highly specific definition and move the current definition to a better named tag. A quick browse through that tag shows that it's already severely misused.

spe said:
I feel like it might be wise to repurpose partially_clothed for all states of partial undress rather than the current highly specific definition and move the current definition to a better named tag. A quick browse through that tag shows that it's already severely misused.

I completely agree

The bulk update request #9678 is pending approval.

change category half_naked (2249) -> invalid

Reason: Might as well as get the ball rolling, I guess. The half_naked wiki flat-out states that we're not supposed to use it in favor of other tags. Thus, it's an invalid tag and should be properly categorized.

  • 1