The tag implication #65614 vaginal -> pussy has been rejected.

Reason: If you're doing something with the vagina (vaginal), there's gotta be a vagina in there somewhere... right?

EDIT: The tag implication vaginal -> pussy (forum #424539) has been rejected by @spe.

Is there any possibility that an image would have an angle of entry that is obviously vaginal, even if the pussy isn't actually visible (such as being covered by a leg?)

maskedstranger said:
Reason: If you're doing something with the vagina (vaginal), there's gotta be a vagina in there somewhere... right?

It doesn't have to be directly visible, it can be inferred from the position of other things. e.g.
post #5177131

watsit said:
It doesn't have to be directly visible, it can be inferred from the position of other things. e.g.
post #5177131

Makes sense!

maskedstranger said:
Reason: If you're doing something with the vagina (vaginal), there's gotta be a vagina in there somewhere... right?

Next, you're going to suggest implying penile -> penis without looking in the forums first for past discussions.

You can cancel your implication by going to implication #65614 and hitting reject

The tag implication vaginal -> pussy (forum #424539) has been rejected by @spe.