The tag implication #65645 breeding_request -> impregnation_request has been rejected.

Reason: breeding_request is when the word 'breed' is referenced in some sort of phrase in a request to be bred. It is basically a specific variant of impregnation_request. Also should it implicate impregnation_request even if the scenario doesn't have vaginal sex? Iirc I saw it be used in other penetration sex as well, as weird as that may be.

EDIT: The tag implication breeding_request -> impregnation_request (forum #424903) has been rejected by @Dinbyy.

...this seems unnecessary. I don't think we need a tag for specifically when the word "breed" is said.

wandering_spaniel said:
...this seems unnecessary. I don't think we need a tag for specifically when the word "breed" is said.

There's quite a few ways to say "I want to be impregnated," so there might be the need for other kinds of phrases to be made into tags as well. If there isn't really a need for this, I'll reject the implication and open a BUR here for alias.

The tag implication breeding_request -> impregnation_request (forum #424903) has been rejected by @Dinbyy.

The bulk update request #9738 is pending approval.

create alias breeding_request (577) -> impregnation_request (3850)

Reason: Alias of specific phrasing of a kind of request.

I see quite a few posts under breeding_request male/male which would not be appropriate if also moved to impregnation_request.

thegreatwolfgang said:
I see quite a few posts under breeding_request male/male which would not be appropriate if also moved to impregnation_request.

Breeding is done by impregnation. That the characters are the same sex and can't actually breed/be impregnated is irrelevant to the request being made (part of the reason why these tags that only describe what text is in the image aren't good, as it doesn't have to make sense for the rest of the image; see also females getting called good_boy, or males getting called good_girl).