The tag implication #65655 kilt -> clothing has been rejected.

Reason: A kilt is a piece of clothing, often worn by men.

EDIT: The tag implication kilt -> clothing (forum #425175) has been rejected by @spe.

Nah, directly implying to clothing tag is not the way to go here. It should be be instead implied to bottomwear (or some more fitting subcategory of bottomwear), which would imply clothing.

rupikonna said:
Nah, directly implying to clothing tag is not the way to go here. It should be be instead implied to bottomwear (or some more fitting subcategory of bottomwear), which would imply clothing.

Putting kilt under bottomwear puts it alongside pants and skirt. I don't see a good subcategory to put kilt under. It's not really a skirt, since it isn't sewn together at the ends to form a tube-y shape. Also people searching for skirt probably aren't looking for kilts.

sightglass said:
Putting kilt under bottomwear puts it alongside pants and skirt. I don't see a good subcategory to put kilt under. It's not really a skirt, since it isn't sewn together at the ends to form a tube-y shape. Also people searching for skirt probably aren't looking for kilts.

They’re not saying to have it imply skirt. they're saying it should be:
Kilt -> bottomwear -> clothing

Clothing worn on the bottom is bottomwear so having kilt imply bottomwear just makes sense.

The tag implication kilt -> clothing (forum #425175) has been rejected by @spe.