Implicating cum_from_mouth → cum_in_mouth
Link to implication

Reason:

Where else could it come from, after all? Cum_from_nose is implicated to cum_in_nose

Hmm, I don't think that's what people who are looking for cum_in_mouth want to see, but I guess its technically true.

Really? Like cum_drool?

I was thinking that cum_from_mouth was more often "so much extreme anal sex that they have cum coming from their mouth" kinda thing, but I reviewed it after my last post and that doesn't seem to be that tag's main use.

So yeah, I say go for it

Tokaido said:
I was thinking that cum_from_mouth was more often "so much extreme anal sex that they have cum coming from their mouth" kinda thing, but I reviewed it after my last post and that doesn't seem to be that tag's main use.

So yeah, I say go for it

That's definitely one of the applications for cum_from_mouth, but since this implication would add images in cum_in_mouth (and not otherwise change anything about cum_from_mouth), I thought you add ideas about the latter tag.

Circeus said:
That's definitely one of the applications for cum_from_mouth, but since this implication would add images in cum_in_mouth (and not otherwise change anything about cum_from_mouth), I thought you add ideas about the latter tag.

I did! I just meant that, when this goes through, if you search for cum_in_mouth you're also going to see some cum_from_mouth images. including the anal sex example I mentioned earlier. I think that's probably OK though.

There's a specific tag for that cum through, which can be negated or blacklisted in that case.

Of course, which is why I totally agree with ya

Approved