https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=i_has_a_flavor

https://e621.net/post?tags=i_has_a_flavor

Is there a better, less meme-y way to word this tag? Like self_tasting?

Licking_fingers?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Licking_fingers?

post #300824
I see no fingers here.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
post #300824
I see no fingers here.

Damn. How about tasting?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Damn. How about tasting?

That would imply vore.

I disagree with the Op though, the meme tag is one of the best tags :3

Conker said:
I disagree with the Op though, the meme tag is one of the best tags :3

It doesn't fit with TWYS, nor does it properly or accurately describe what it's being used to tag, which is, someone tasting their own bodily fluids.

Says you..

corgi_bread said:
It doesn't fit with TWYS, nor does it properly or accurately describe what it's being used to tag, which is, someone tasting their own bodily fluids.

post #209268
In this image I see flavor

Conker said:
Says you..post #209268
In this image I see flavor

There is no 'flavor' in that image. Flavor isn't visible, it's not tangible.

corgi_bread said:
There is no 'flavor' in that image. Flavor isn't visible, it's not tangible.

Look harder...

Conker said:
Look harder...

It's not there. I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Conker said:
Look harder...

I agree with CB. You can't technically see flavor.

Plus, that creature isn't a flavor....it's a creature :I

I really fail to see what is wrong with current name. It's silly name, but there are other silly tags like what_has_science_done (You can't see science either, you know.), and it's not really that not intuitive and I see no reason to change it.

Meanwhile Conker changed wiki to:

simply, tasting one's self (or someone else)

I don't think it's correct.

It's not descriptive of what it's being used to tag, though. I has a flavor doesn't immediately lead me to think that they're specifically tasting their own cum/shit/piss/vomit/whatever comes out of their body.

corgi_bread said:
It's not descriptive of what it's being used to tag, though. I has a flavor doesn't immediately lead me to think that they're specifically tasting their own cum/shit/piss/vomit/whatever comes out of their body.

It doesn't matter.
Joke tags don't follow rules, they don't have to.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Meanwhile Conker changed wiki to:simply, tasting one's self (or someone else)
I don't think it's correct.

Well I saw the wiki and it had a wrong kind of definition due to the tag being from a meme of licking skin not body fluid. Not all images tagged with it had anything to do with licking ones own cum. I just felt the wiki was a little off on the tag's meaning.

If one can lick the skin/fur of themselves and see they has flavor, then its possible for one to lick anther's skin.fur and see if they has flavor as well. The science is all there, and it seems possible. Besides the meme of flavor started from a image of someone licking another and saying you has flavor (or something to that effect) so licking someone else could be a possible outcome of the meme/tag.

Example furry1 licks furry2 and then furry2 says "I has flavor", I just put the (someone else) bit encase it pops up in a few other images on the site now or in the future.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I really fail to see what is wrong with current name. It's silly name, but there are other silly tags like what_has_science_done (You can't see science either, you know.), and it's not really that not intuitive and I see no reason to change it.

I agree

Halite said:
It doesn't matter.
Joke tags don't follow rules, they don't have to.

All tags have to follow the rules.

corgi_bread said:
All tags have to follow the rules.

Not joke tags. Admins have said this from time to time.

This was brought up a few months ago and suggested tags were self_taste and cum_taste. I like the second one better, it doesn't make assumptions of who the fluid came from. Then again, I think we need one specifically for people tasting their own cum (male or female). Maybe self_taste implies cum_taste? (or _tasting)

tony311 said:
This was brought up a few months ago and suggested tags were self_taste and cum_taste. I like the second one better, it doesn't make assumptions of who the fluid came from. Then again, I think we need one specifically for people tasting their own cum (male or female). Maybe self_taste implies cum_taste? (or _tasting)

I could get behind this. I think tasting works better than taste, it implies that they're in the process of tasting it.

tony311 said:
This was brought up a few months ago and suggested tags were self_taste and cum_taste. I like the second one better, it doesn't make assumptions of who the fluid came from. Then again, I think we need one specifically for people tasting their own cum (male or female). Maybe self_taste implies cum_taste? (or _tasting)

But some images have nothing to do with cum and are safe images.

I'm against change, but if I were to change the name I would change to OP idea of self_tasting. And certainly wouldn't limit it to tasting just cum.

I agree with Gilda. Is there a reason to limit the tag to a single body fluid?