I'm little confused about these tags, because while sisters and brothers are described like this:

Images or animations depicting at least two male characters who are siblings.

then brother_and_sister has slightly different meaning.

Exactly what it says on the box; this tag indicates an image containing a male and female sibling pair. The specific presence of this tag generally indicates an incestuous image, in which the brother and sister are having sex.

I was about to change it to definition, similar to 2 others, but then I checked, that all definition were given by the same person. Is there any reason why brother_and_sister is treated differently than sisters and brothers?

I would personally opt for treating it exactly the same. If someone want incest, xe could search for brother_and_sister incest

EDIT:

Also I think that there should be implication.
brothers -> male
sisters -> female
brother_and_sister -> male female

I think that sounds about right to change it to just like the first definition

Bumping, because I still think, that implications
brothers -> male
sisters -> female
brother_and_sister -> male
brother_and_sister -> female

should be useful, and I want to ask same thing as in original post about father/mother_and_daughter/son tags.

They are underused, and have, IMO, stupid addition that they should be used in sexual situations only.

anomaly said:
I would personally opt for treating it exactly the same. If someone want incest, xe could search for brother_and_sister incest

anomaly said:

for treating it exactly the same. If someone want incest, xe could search for

anomaly said:

If someone want incest, xe could

anomaly said:

incest, xe

anomaly said:

xe

ಠ_ಠ

What? I like this gender-neutral pronoun.

What's wrong with singular they?

Nothing. Now what about other things (like those suggested implications) I mentioned in my previous posts?

Well, if we've agreed upon this definition, then each of the following wiki pages need to be clarified to reflect it:

• father_and_daughter
• mother_and_son
• brother_and_sister
• brothers
• sisters
• twins
• siblings
• cousins

In response to the suggested implications, I think it would be much better to do so indirectly via:

• father_and_daughter +> father, daughter
• father +> male
• daughter +> female
• mother_and_son +> mother, son
• mother +> female
• son +> male
• brother_and_sister +> brother, sister, siblings
• brother +> male
• sister +> female
• brothers +> brother, siblings
• sisters +> sister, siblings
• twins +> siblings
• cousins +> cousin

It could be argued that siblings belongs farther up the chain as an implication of the brother and sister tags, but, because a situation could arise in which an individual is indicated as one of the two without his sibling being explicitly present (such as a card that reads "I ♥ My Big Brother"), I would advise against this. Also, since the same sort of situation could arise for a cousin, I would keep cousin as an implication of cousins rather than an alias to it.

Snowy said:
What's wrong with singular they?

The singular they is an abomination and all who follow its teachings are heretics.

The gender implications are very valuable in my opinion.
gay -> male often rescued me.

honestly don't encourage incest it's wrong and leads to pedophila

DragonFanHooper said:
honestly don't encourage incest it's wrong and leads to pedophila

No one is encouraging it. It appears in our database and we must tag it appropriately, also please stop bumping dead topics without contributing to them

Rainbow_Dash said:
No one is encouraging it. It appears in our database and we must tag it appropriately, also please stop bumping dead topics without contributing to them

please get a life and grow up also acting all angry gets you nowhere

Rainbow_Dash said:
No one is encouraging it. It appears in our database and we must tag it appropriately, also please stop bumping dead topics without contributing to them

It's not dead topic. It has completely alive definitions and implication propositions. With no positive, nor negative answer from any admin. Or have I missed something?

anomaly said:
It's not dead topic. It has completely alive definitions and implication propositions. With no positive, nor negative answer from any admin. Or have I missed something?

The user Rain was talking to has been attacking almost every forum post that has shown up recently, looks like she copy pasted the warning becuse the user basicly said every time somthing along the lines of "dont do this, dont do that, *insert insults here*"

anomaly said:
It's not dead topic. It has completely alive definitions and implication propositions. With no positive, nor negative answer from any admin. Or have I missed something?

Yes, I was talking about a user. Anyway, sorry I let this topic slip; I can only be in so many places at a time.

Alright let's discuss. Is there any way that mixed gender characters (herms, dickgirls, cuntboys, etc) could be involved and what would we tag those as? If a maleherm appears to be the father, do we tag father (and subsequently mal because of the implication) or de we just not tag father? If we don't tag father then do we still tag incest?

My suggestion is to make these implications and then for intersex characters just have incest and nothing else

Rainbow_Dash said:
Yes, I was talking about a user. Anyway, sorry I let this topic slip; I can only be in so many places at a time.

Alright let's discuss. Is there any way that mixed gender characters (herms, dickgirls, cuntboys, etc) could be involved and what would we tag those as? If a maleherm appears to be the father, do we tag father (and subsequently mal because of the implication) or de we just not tag father? If we don't tag father then do we still tag incest?

My suggestion is to make these implications and then for intersex characters just have incest and nothing else

If we expand father and mother, son and daughter, and brother and sister to include intersex characters, things are going to get very confusing very fast. We may therefore want to use only the respective gender-neutral titles of parent, child, and sibling (note the singularity of the latter) when describing nonstandard genders. This would also need the implications:

• father, mother +> parent
• son, daughter +> child
• brother, sister +> sibling

I agree with that, will make implications if no one else disagrees

Okay I made these and aliased siblings to sibling