I see no purpose to the implied homosexuality tag when more objective tags like male/male, female/female, no homo, and orientation play exist.
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
I see no purpose to the implied homosexuality tag when more objective tags like male/male, female/female, no homo, and orientation play exist.
alphamule said:
post #1994292
Nothing homosexual there, even implied. That's clearly male/female and nothing male/male or female/female happened. At best, it just means he thought about another guy while having sex, which could just as well make him bisexual instead of homosexual (not that we tag sexual orientation, let alone what someone's orientation may be implied to be from vague statements).
watsit said:
Nothing homosexual there, even implied. That's clearly male/female and nothing male/male or female/female happened. At best, it just means he thought about another guy while having sex, which could just as well make him bisexual instead of homosexual (not that we tag sexual orientation, let alone what someone's orientation may be implied to be from vague statements).
Yeah, this is why it was used as example. It's typical of most of the posts.