Aliasing:

princess_celestia_(eg) -> principal_celestia_(eg)
princess_luna_(eg) -> principal_luna_(eg)

Reason: In this piece of shit they are not princesses, but principals. They are also idiots, but I don't think that this alias would pass.

Implicating:
principal_celestia_(eg) -> equestria_girls
principal_luna_(eg) -> equestria_girls

Reason: So my blacklist would work better.

idiot_celestia_(eg) sounds like an interesting tag to me.

Well, makes sense to me, but what if they are not always being depicted as principles?

I think I'll leave them as they are and implicate them to equestria_girls, if that works for everyone else

Rainbow_Dash said:
Well, makes sense to me, but what if they are not always being depicted as principles?

In that case wouldn't it be the same for princess_celestia_(mlp) and princess_luna_(mlp) ?
I thought those were their names in EG (principal_*) so I think the alias fits IMO :P

Rainbow_Dash said:
Well, makes sense to me, but what if they are not always being depicted as principles?

I think I'll leave them as they are and implicate them to equestria_girls, if that works for everyone else

They're always idiots so the idiot_celestia_(eg) tag would work Principal is, really, just part of their character name. They're not princesses in EG so the current tags make less sense. Princess is just in general misleading. I think the tag should be either principal_celestia_(eg) or celestia_(eg). Additionally, Luna is the vice principal.

I also think that principal is the part of their names and asking what if they are not always depicted as them is like asking how should we name moominmamma before she was pregnant.
BTW, the more I think about it, the more I like idiot_celestia_(eg) suggestion.