It either needs mass cleaning and implication to female, or name and wiki description change so it will apply to cuntboys and herms.
I'm personally for latter one, but what should be new name for this tag?
Updated by 123easy
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
It either needs mass cleaning and implication to female, or name and wiki description change so it will apply to cuntboys and herms.
I'm personally for latter one, but what should be new name for this tag?
Updated by 123easy
I think the tag itself is fine, but it probably does need some cleaning up. I don't necessarily agree with the implication however, as like you stated, it could apply to a herm or dickgirl as well. I'm not sure there's another tag that could cover the act, other than squirting, and I feel like that would be misused like crazy.
Updated by anonymous
The following tags are aliased to this tag: squirting, pussy_squirt
Maybe, pussy_squirt? Or pussy_ejaculation? I don't like idea of naming this tag as a female_ejaculation when it's applied not only to females.
corgi bread said:
it could apply to a herm or dickgirl as well.
Dickgirl don't have pussies, so I don't think that this tag should be for them.
Updated by anonymous
Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Dickgirl don't have pussies, so I don't think that this tag should be for them.
Sorry, I meant cuntboy.
I like pussy_ejaculation; it's straight, to the point, and perfectly describes what's happening (inb4 someone comes in and says that it's not ejaculation, that they're just peeing).
Updated by anonymous
pussy_ejaculation sounds like a good plan for it.
Updated by anonymous
What about squirting?
Updated by anonymous
corgi_bread said:
Sorry, I meant cuntboy.I like pussy_ejaculation; it's straight, to the point, and perfectly describes what's happening (inb4 someone comes in and says that it's not ejaculation, that they're just peeing).
That does not sound right...
We have Vaginal, Vaginal_insertion, Vaginal_fingering, and about 15 other Vaginal_XXXXXXXXXX tags.
Wouldn't this fit a tag of Vaginal_Ejaculation a bit more closely?
Updated by anonymous
Patch said:
What about squirting?
I have concerns about it being misused for male ejaculation, or the squirting of any liquid, despite what we may say in the wiki.
_Waffles_ said:
That does not sound right...We have Vaginal, Vaginal_insertion, Vaginal_fingering, and about 15 other Vaginal_XXXXXXXXXX tags.
Wouldn't this fit a tag of Vaginal_Ejaculation a bit more closely?
We could certainly do vaginal_ejaculation as well, it does sound a bit more professional.
Updated by anonymous
vaginal_ejaculation could be interpreted as internal cumshot. What about vaginal_squirting?
Updated by anonymous
edidaf said:
vaginal_ejaculation could be interpreted as internal cumshot. What about vaginal_squirting?
That seems far too obscure. The actual term is female ejaculation, so who'd ever even think of searching for vaginal_squirting? And it kind of sounds like watersports to me.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
That seems far too obscure. The actual term is female ejaculation, so who'd ever even think of searching for vaginal_squirting? And it kind of sounds like watersports to me.
Well no matter what we alias this tag to, the alias will take care of erroneous searches for it. I like pussy_squirting, personally.
Updated by anonymous
edidaf said:
vaginal_ejaculation could be interpreted as internal cumshot. What about vaginal_squirting?
No, https://e621.net/post/index/1/internal_cumshot is internal cumshot. :P If we don't go for vaginal_ejaculation, though, I would support vaginal_squirting; Pussy is too slang-y, and what with the slew of other vaginal tags we have, it seems appropriate to keep them consistant.
Updated by anonymous
Well, can't the images of herms and cuntboys with the female_ejaculation tag and any of the future images featuring it just be tagged with orgasm? Completely omitting the female_ejaculation tag seems pointless, IMO.
Edit: To clarify, I mean images with herms and cuntboys, not females.
Updated by anonymous
JoeX said:
Well, can't the images of herms and cuntboys with the female_ejaculation tag and any of the future images featuring it just be tagged with orgasm? Completely omitting the female_ejaculation tag seems pointless, IMO.Edit: To clarify, I mean images with herms and cuntboys, not females.
There's no reason the tag should only apply to female. Female ejaculation refers to the type of ejaculate, not the gender of the one producing it.
The name's fine, the only thing that needs to be changed is the wiki.
Updated by anonymous
DrHorse said:
There's no reason the tag should only apply to female. Female ejaculation refers to the type of ejaculate, not the gender of the one producing it.The name's fine, the only thing that needs to be changed is the wiki.
Ah, not really. If it were referring to the fluid, it would be female_ejaculate. Ejaculation is the ACT of doing so.
Updated by anonymous
JoeX said:
Ah, not really. If it were referring to the fluid, it would be female_ejaculate. Ejaculation is the ACT of doing so.
Mhm, so more correctly it is referring to the act of ejaculation from the female sex organ rather than the male, which in herms at least is a required distinction on the individual level- and for fetishes, required on a very broad level (I search it from time to time, myself).
Updated by anonymous