Aliasing vang → kintuse
Link to alias

Reason:

Same character

9KyksuHehT said:
Aliasing vang → kintuse
Link to alias

Reason:

Same character

Proof?

123easy said:
Proof?

Look at the posts, both are tagged with the same character.
Here's the character owner's FA page for more proof

9KyksuHehT said:
Look at the posts, both are tagged with the same character.
Here's the character owner's FA page for more proof

Just because they're tagged wiitth the same name doesn't mean much; we have aa few relics mistagged under older tagging schema. That FA page, however, is exactly the sort of proof I meant, thanks. +1 to the alias, side-suggestion of implying char. owner Vang Kintuse.

uhm, it is pretty obvious that the alias is wrong:

Full Name: Vang Kintuse
Artist Type: Art Whore

so it should alias to Vang and Kintsune to Vang_Kintsune.

Linnefer said:
uhm, it is pretty obvious that the alias is wrong:

Full Name: Vang Kintuse
Artist Type: Art Whore

so it should alias to Vang and Kintsune to Vang_Kintsune.

In all seriousness, this alias is not wrong at all. If anything, it makes it easier to alias to vang_kintuse. First, we alias "vang" -> "kintuse" (which is the current suggestion), and then alias "kintuse" -> "vang_kintuse"

9KyksuHehT said:
Actually, aliasing it to vang_kintsune is incorrect, it's vang_kintuse :p In all seriousness, this alias is not wrong at all. If anything, it makes it easier to alias to vang_kintuse. First, we alias "vang" -> "kintuse" (which is the current suggestion), and then alias "kintuse" -> "vang_kintuse"

Ehhh, alias chains are bad.

Linnefer said:
uhm, it is pretty obvious that the alias is wrong:

Full Name: Vang Kintuse
Artist Type: Art Whore

so it should alias to Vang and Kintsune to Vang_Kintsune.

Thing is, if you check the art and his user name, he references himself as simply "Kintuse", thus why I didn't bring that up myself. Perhaps simply ask the man himself what he prefers to be called?