Aliasing wingless → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

If it's not there, don't tag it.

For high-profile characters that are usually recognized as having wings, shouldn't they be tagged wingless if they lack them?

How is that relevant to TWYS?
There are countless posts of anthrofied characters (pokemon, ponies, etc), most of which are depicted without wings. But if it's not there, don't tag it.

Let me demonstrate why it's troublesome:
post #55188

Why is that tagged as wingless? Does the character normally have wings? ...maybe it's a name? Or is it tagged as such because dragons generally have wings, but that one doesn't?

Far more trouble than it is worth. When you can just search for "<character> -wings" instead.

Genjar said:
How is that relevant to TWYS?
There are countless posts of anthrofied characters (pokemon, ponies, etc), most of which are depicted without wings. But if it's not there, don't tag it.

Let me demonstrate why it's troublesome:
post #55188

Why is that tagged as wingless? Does the character normally have wings? ...maybe it's a name? Or is it tagged as such because dragons generally have wings, but that one doesn't?

Far more trouble than it is worth. When you can just search for "<character> -wings" instead.

not saying it's being used right. We just have other exceptions for other tags like that- why I phrased it as a question.

123easy said:
For high-profile characters that are usually recognized as having wings, shouldn't they be tagged wingless if they lack them?

No.