Implicating goo_girl → goo
Link to implication

Reason:

self-explanatory

Goo is currently set as species, and aliased with ooze and gel. So images such as this...
post #392047
...get tagged as 'Species: goo'. That seems wrong to me. Something should be done about that, before aliasing or implicating more tags to it.

There's also the general tag slime. I'm not sure what's the exact difference, but those could use wiki entries. Assuming that we even want to keep those separate.

Genjar said:
Goo is currently set as species, and aliased with ooze and gel. So images such as this...
post #392047
...get tagged as 'Species: goo'. That seems wrong to me. Something should be done about that, before aliasing or implicating more tags to it.

I don't think that type of thing, just like generic liquids, should be tagged. Tags should be as specific as possible: oil, tar, cum, not just goo. If cases like that really need their own tag, then call it unknown_goo or something similar, so we're not just adding an extra tag to every post tagged with cum.

Either way, these mistaggings shouldn't have anything to do with this implication, as none of them are a part of the tag being implicated.

Edit: Now that I look at that more closely, that's definitely tar. Although I'm sure there's other posts that might benefit from a unknown_goo tag.