Implicating beastiality → feral
Link to implication

Reason:

It takes a feral animal to have beastiality.

Should read wikis first

beastiality is not a word.

I definitely just typod the tag when I was searching for implications. Though on that note should it imply human, and have a cleanup where some of those pics should be anthro on feral instead.

Sollux said:
I definitely just typod the tag when I was searching for implications. Though on that note should it imply human, and have a cleanup where some of those pics should be anthro on feral instead.

Anthro furry on feral is still bestiality in my mind

Peekaboo said:
A anthropomorphic being fucking by a feral being is still bestiality.

I agree, but we're told to use anthro_on_feral instead, and that's how we've always separated it to date. Some people don't want to see humans, just furries and ferals. personally I want to tell them to search bestiality -human or bestiality anthro, but... eh.

Yeah, I think the anthro_on_feral separation is useful. Images such as these don't exactly scream bestiality to me:
post #418826 post #418987

It's good to have a separate tag for those. Bestiality is generally defined as sex with non-sapient animals, but that of course doesn't mesh well with TWYS..

Sollux said:
I definitely just typod the tag when I was searching for implications. Though on that note should it imply human, and have a cleanup where some of those pics should be anthro on feral instead.

Currently anthro_on_feral implies bestiality, so clean up will do nothing before it's unimplicated.

You might want to see forum #46432

To complicate matters, there's also the pokephilia tag. Which was created as a pokemon equivalent of the bestiality tag, when some users insisted that sex between human and pokemon (or anthro and pokemon) isn't bestiality.

But because of the anthro_on_feral implication to bestiality, there's now plenty of pokemon images that get tagged as both pokephilia and bestiality. Even though it was supposed to only be one or the other. It's bit of a mess and I don't know how to untangle it.

Genjar said:
To complicate matters, there's also the pokephilia tag. Which was created as a pokemon equivalent of the bestiality tag, when some users insisted that sex between human and pokemon (or anthro and pokemon) isn't bestiality.

But because of the anthro_on_feral implication to bestiality, there's now plenty of pokemon images that get tagged as both pokephilia and bestiality. Even though it was supposed to only be one or the other. It's bit of a mess and I don't know how to untangle it.

Pokephilia is about pokemon and non pokemon having sex/kissing/etc. It has nothing to do with bestiality/anthro_on_feral etc. Anthro character fucking anthro pokemon, like Lucario, is still tagged pokephilia. Anthro/human on feral pokemon are still getting tagged bestiality/anthro on feral tag additionaly.

Nope, that's not how it was supposed to be used here. Pokephilia = Pokemon bestiality.
Read this thread: https://e621.net/forum/show/19661

Genjar said:
Nope, that's not how it was supposed to be used here. Pokephilia = Pokemon bestiality.
Read this thread: https://e621.net/forum/show/19661

I don't care what was intention of people in the past. Current wiki, in which creation admin was involved, states that this is pokemon (even anthro though not anthrofied - this is stupid IMO. It should be for every pokemon.) and not pokemon. Current forum threads like forum #90421 don't state that this is only for bestiality.