Implicating Autobukkake → Cum_on_self
Link to implication

Reason:

...Is that even an appropriate term? Bukkake is when there are multiples ejaculating over a single individual, but autobukkake is defined as only the individual doing so. I think it should just be aliased.

+1 for alias.

Searching for 'masturbation covered_in_cum solo' seems to get similar results.

I don't think this is needed. One more for the alias.

Genjar said:
Searching for 'masturbation covered_in_cum solo' seems to get similar results.

I don't think this is needed. One more for the alias.

Hmm. This actually makes me wonder. Is autobukkake more aligned with being covered in cum, or just simply having cum upon oneself? If the former, then alias to covered_in_cum would probably be more appropriate, would it not?

It's a combination of covered_in_cum and cum_on_self. Sadly, double aliases won't work, I think. And before you want to implicate one and aliase the other: I hate to break it down on you, but I've heard the system aliases first, and implies later.

Asphyxia said:
It's a combination of covered_in_cum and cum_on_self. Sadly, double aliases won't work, I think. And before you want to implicate one and aliase the other: I hate to break it down on you, but I've heard the system aliases first, and implies later.

I'm aware. Thus why bringing it up whether it's better to covered_in_cum vs. cum_on_self. It fits both, but which does it fit *better*.

Bukkake doesn't imply covered_in_cum. Technically bukkake can just be a facial, which might not qualify as "a majority of their body" depending on how messy it is.

I think the best solution is an alias to cum_on_self.

Genjar said:
Searching for 'masturbation covered_in_cum solo' seems to get similar results.

I don't think this is needed. One more for the alias.

If a single tag can replace 3 in a search, it's probably a good tag to have.

Halite said:
If a single tag can replace 3 in a search, it's probably a good tag to have.

I agree with this. +1